Cambridge Associates’ Q4 2026 venture capital benchmark reveals a stark vintage-year divide. Funds from 2018–2019 are delivering strong returns—median IRR of 18–22%—as portfolio companies mature and exit. The 2020–2021 vintages, by contrast, are underwater. Median IRR for 2021 vintage funds sits at -8%, with several marquee funds reporting -15% to -20%.
The 2020–2021 vintage problem stems from peak valuations. Funds that deployed heavily in 2021 bought at 15–20x revenue multiples; many of those companies have since raised down rounds or failed. The 2022–2023 vintages are too early to call, but early marks suggest more disciplined entry prices may yield better outcomes.
Vintage Year Performance Snapshot
2018: Median IRR 22%, TVPI 1.8x. 2019: 19%, 1.6x. 2020: 4%, 1.1x. 2021: -8%, 0.9x. 2022: 2%, 1.0x. 2023: 5%, 1.1x. 2024–2026 vintages are too early for meaningful data. The spread between top and bottom quartile has widened—top-quartile 2021 funds are at 12% IRR, while bottom quartile is -22%.
The 2021 vintage will take years to resolve. Many portfolio companies have 3–5 years of runway; exits may not materialize until 2028–2030. Some will recover through growth; others will require restructuring or wind-down. LPs are modeling various scenarios—best case, the 2021 vintage recovers to 8–10% IRR; worst case, it remains negative.
What LPs Are Doing
LPs are scrutinizing vintage-year exposure. Many are avoiding new commitments to managers with heavy 2021 deployment. Secondary buyers are discounting 2021 vintage interests by 30–50%. For GPs, the lesson is clear: vintage-year discipline matters. Fundraising in 2027 will require demonstrating deployment discipline.
Implications for the Ecosystem
The 2021 vintage hangover will linger. Portfolio companies from that vintage will need more time to grow into their valuations or face restructuring. For founders, the message is to focus on unit economics and capital efficiency—the days of growth-at-all-costs are over. Startups that can reach profitability will have more options. The next cycle will reward discipline.
What the Data Means for You
If you’re an LP, vintage-year diversification matters. Avoid over-concentration in 2020–2021 vintages. If you’re a founder, the lesson is deployment discipline—the GPs who invested at peak valuations are now under pressure. If you’re a GP, demonstrating that you deployed cautiously in 2021 will help with future fundraising. The market has a long memory. Top-quartile 2018–2019 funds are now raising follow-ons with strong demand; 2021-vintage managers are facing extended fundraises.
Cambridge Associates’ benchmark shows 2018–2019 vintages at 18–22% median IRR; 2021 is at -8% with several marquee funds at -15% to -20%. The spread between top and bottom quartile has widened—top-quartile 2021 funds at 12% IRR, bottom at -22%. Secondary buyers discount 2021 vintage interests by 30–50%. The 2021 vintage will take years to resolve; many portfolio companies have 3–5 years of runway. Exits may not materialize until 2028–2030. Plan for an extended hold period.
LPs are scrutinizing vintage-year exposure and avoiding new commitments to managers with heavy 2021 deployment. GPs who can demonstrate they deployed cautiously in 2021 will have an advantage in fundraising. The 2022–2023 vintages are too early to call, but early marks suggest more disciplined entry prices may yield better outcomes. The lesson for the ecosystem: vintage-year discipline matters. The 2021 hangover will linger for years—portfolio companies will need time to grow into valuations or face restructuring.
What This Means for Founders and Fund Managers
The fundraising environment in late 2026 demands a fundamentally different approach from both founders and fund managers. According to PitchBook’s Q3 2026 report, median time-to-close for Series A rounds increased from 4.5 months to 7.2 months, while the number of meetings required before a term sheet doubled from an average of 12 to 24. This elongated timeline means founders need at least 9-12 months of runway before starting their raise — a significant shift from the 2021 era when companies could close rounds in weeks.
Fund managers face their own challenges. LP commitment cycles have lengthened from 6 months to 14 months on average, and first-time fund managers are seeing close rates drop to 15% from 25% in 2022. The surviving strategy: demonstrate clear portfolio value creation, not just IRR projections. Funds that can show portfolio revenue growth of 2-3x, improving unit economics, and clear paths to profitability are still oversubscribed. The rest are struggling. As Startup Nerve has documented, the startup ecosystem is adapting to this new reality with more capital-efficient business models.
Looking ahead to 2027, the consensus among top VCs is cautious optimism. Dry powder remains at record levels ($311 billion per Preqin), suggesting that capital will deploy — but selectively. The winners will be companies with proven product-market fit, strong unit economics, and AI-native business models that demonstrate genuine efficiency gains. For analysis of which AI sectors are attracting the most investment, see Next Disruption’s coverage of the AI investment landscape.
Dive deeper: This article is part of our comprehensive guide — Venture Capital in India: The Complete Guide.
1 thought on “Venture Returns by Vintage Year”